Concern over funding of class actions

Original article by Marianna Papadakis
The Australian Financial Review – Page: 13 : 28-Aug-14

The Australian Institute of Company Directors’ GM, Steve Burrell, has urged stricter regulation of litigation funders. He notes that growing competition in the sector has prompted a rise in class actions in the last 18 months. Litigation funders are typically paid 20-35 per cent of the total payout in successful class actions, but Burrell is concerned about a proposal to allow litigation funders to use the common fund system in Australia

CORPORATES
AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF COMPANY DIRECTORS, INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION FUNDING PARTNERS INCORPORATED, ALLCO FINANCE GROUP LIMITED, BENTHAM IMF LIMITED – ASX IMF, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED – ASX ANZ, CITIBANK PTY LTD, WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION – ASX WBC, AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS CONSUMER ACTION NETWORK LIMITED, TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED – ASX TLS, SINGTEL OPTUS PTY LTD, SINGAPORE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED – ASX SGT, VODAFONE AUSTRALIA LIMITED, NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT AUSTRALIA

Appeal lost on Sunday rates

Original article by Lucille Keen
The Australian Financial Review – Page: 11 : 27-Aug-14

The Federal Court of Australia has rejected a bid to overturn the Fair Work Commission’s ruling that penalty rates for hospitality workers should be reduced. The appeal was lodged by the United Voice union, after the Restaurant & Catering Association of Victoria and Australian Business Industrial succeeded in a bid to have Sunday penalty rates reduced. Many restaurant and cafe owners do not open on weekends due to high penalty rates

CORPORATES
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA. FAIR WORK COMMISSION, RESTAURANT AND CATERING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF VICTORIA, RESTAURANT AND CATERING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AUSTRALIA INCORPORATED, UNITED VOICE, AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS INDUSTRIAL, GARFISH, NSW BUSINESS CHAMBER LIMITED

ASADA could be in breach of law

Original article by Jon Pierik
The Age – Page: 41 : 15-Jul-14

A warning issued by the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) could have breached legislation. ASADA filed its defence document on 12 July 2014, in which it stated that it could reissue show-cause notices to 34 current and former players of Essendon Football Club. Graham Smith, a partner with Clayton Utz, says the warning could be interpreted as an infringement of the model litigant rules

CORPORATES
AUSTRALIAN SPORTS ANTI-DOPING AGENCY, AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS’ ASSOCIATION, ESSENDON FOOTBALL CLUB, CLAYTON UTZ, FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA, AUSTRALIA. ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S DEPT