Uber cases to test work laws

Original article by Marianna Papadakis
The Australian Financial Review – Page: 9 : 5-Oct-15

Uber claims that its drivers are independent contractors rather than employees, but they have launched a class action in the US seeking to be classified as employees. Clayton Utz lawyer Saul Harben says the outcome of the case could have implication for the definition of an employee under Australia’s workplace laws. He adds that workplace laws should be amended to include a definition of what constitutes an independent contractor.

CORPORATES
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, CLAYTON UTZ, AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE, AUSTRALIAN TAXI INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION, AUSTRALIAN TAXI DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA, SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES, AIRBNB INCORPORATED, LYFT INCORPORATED, TASK RABBIT, MARQUE LAWYERS PTY LTD, AUSTRALIA. PRODUCTIVITY COMMISSION